Now Reading
What You Won’t Hear On The News: The Real Cause Of The Zika Outbreak?

What You Won’t Hear On The News: The Real Cause Of The Zika Outbreak?

The Zika virus has recently been in the news quite a bit lately. With over 4,000 deformed children being born in just Brazil over the last 4 months with those deformities attributed to Zika, it’s no surprise that adults are panicking. We love our children. But what really caused the Zika virus?

First, we should clarify what the Zika virus is and what it does. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) notes,

“Zika virus is spread to people through mosquito bites. The most common symptoms of Zika virus disease are fever, rash, joint pain, and conjunctivitis (red eyes). The illness is usually mild with symptoms lasting from several days to a week. Severe disease requiring hospitalization is uncommon.

“In May 2015, the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) issued an alert regarding the first confirmed Zika virus infection in Brazil. The outbreak in Brazil led to reports of Guillain-Barré syndrome and pregnant women giving birth to babies with birth defects and poor pregnancy outcomes.”

In case you are wondering, Zika had previously been primarily found in Africa, southeast Asia, and the Pacific islands. Now, however, the CDC says that Zika is actively spreading from Brazil and the northern part of South America up through Central America even up into Mexico.

With all of this scary news, you may ask where the Zika virus came from because, for all intents and purposes, it seems to have appeared out of nowhere. Some are saying the the Zika outbreak is an unintended consequence of genetic engineering. Mike Adams writes,

“Now we may be seeing the first wave of the horrific destruction that can be unleashed by self-replicating genetically modified organisms. The Zika virus, now spreading with unbridled ferocity, appears to have been caused by the release of genetically engineered mosquitoes that scientists hoped would sharply reduce malaria infections.”

AntiMedia reports:

“Only the male modified Aedes mosquitoes are supposed to be released into the wild — as they will mate with their unaltered female counterparts. Once offspring are produced, the modified, scientific facet is supposed to ‘kick in’ and kill that larvae before it reaches breeding age — if tetracycline is not present during its development…

“According to an unclassified document from the Trade and Agriculture Directorate Committee for Agriculture dated February 2015, Brazil is the third largest in “global antimicrobial consumption in food animal production” — meaning, Brazil is third in the world for its use of tetracycline in its food animals. As a study by the American Society of Agronomy, et. al., explained, “It is estimated that approximately 75% of antibiotics are not absorbed by animals and are excreted in waste.” One of the antibiotics (or antimicrobials) specifically named in that report for its environmental persistence is tetracycline.”

And, again, Mike Adams notes:

“The presence of antibiotics causes the mosquitoes that are supposed to die off to survive and reproduce. These same genetically engineered mosquitoes may then bite humans, injecting them with the Zika virus that’s now causing horrific mutations in head and brain formation in children.”

Basically, what we have is a situation where scientists thought they could control the impact of their actions, but they didn’t pay attention to the unintended consequences and did not account for the complexity of the world to throw a wrench in their plans.

Adams writes again that, of course,

“As more reports of deformed children keep appearing, the media is freaking out, the CDC is freaking out and the U.S. government is freaking out, demanding urgent calls for yet more vaccines. Alarmingly, the very same scientists who pushed for the release of the genetically engineered mosquitoes that may have caused all this are also now calling for more genetically engineered mosquitoes which they claim will solve this problem.

“But the incompetence and corruption of government and science has never been more blatant: None of the testing with GMO mosquitoes took place in the presence of tetracycline or other antibiotics that are now ubiquitous in the environment due to heavy use of drugs in factory farm operations.”

All of this could be an innocent (if horrific) “side effect” of an attempt to help the world. Keep in mind, though, that governments have a habit of doing terrible things to their populations on purpose under the guise of trying to help, and the scientific community, in bed with those in government who want to control everyone, has a history of wanting to kill off people, too. Simply look at the eugenics movement from the early 20th century which tried to bring legitimacy to racism and, some say, led to the rise of Nazism with it’s racial hatred (Hitler was a supporter of eugenics).

Or, on a more recent note, a scientific conference in Texas supported the idea of a deliberately caused outbreak of Ebola to kill off 90% of the worlds population. This did not happen in the distant past. It happened in 2006, and, some would say, this implies an active hand by scientists and, possibly, governments to reduce the worlds population. Is Zika actually an intended result of that plan?

Regardless, it seems clear that, to protect your children, you may want to consider moving to a place where huge amounts of antibiotics are not used on livestock, and you may want to start planning now to find a place where you can safely move away from the reaches of scientists and, possibly, a government that would kill you “for your own good.”

What do you think is the real cause of the Zika virus outbreak and how should we deal with it? Comment below.

View Comments (1,450)